So.. let us first discuss the social ramifications of Marxism. Let me tell you why it doesn't work. A pre-requisite of Marxism to work is the suffering of the people - and as explained by the Marxist groups, this is to allow for the people to be wise and understanding of the society's needs. Then the people would just enslave themselves and work their hearts out like dogs just to serve the society. In other words, after suffering, they would be too tired to question anything and just obey what the leaders say. Even if the leaders were to talk cock, then they would walk the talk and tok their cocks. Meaning they'll just be in a trance.
Are these the ideals of Marxism? To let people just follow blindly? Then what is this about everyone being equal? I'm sure! If so, where do these faggots like Marx come from? They are the leaders, aren't they? But everyone is equal! There aren't supposed to be leaders! See, even though they try to create a utopia where no one is above the society, in the end we all know where the credit goes to. The cockster at the top who began all these obviously will benefit the most, for he sets the rules and if he says "ALL MEN ARE EQUAL BUT AS I AM A COCKSTER I DESERVE MORE" - no one can question it. Marxism states that men are going to give to the society according to their capacity and gain back what they need. Okay, and who will define all these? The asshole on top. Once again proving that it is a corrupted system.
Now just hold on to your seats because I'm far from done. No, no, the best is yet to be. You think all these are the worst of it? Corruption can be common in even non-Marxist countries, like Malaysia for example. Maybe not that common, but common nonetheless. Even more common than our common tests, which has just been made more common with common class tests - specially implemented to kill off commoners like us. Nevertheless, back to the topic, Marxism is impractical. Try telling our government to go Marxist or communist like some Barisan Socialis and I think you'll get rejected in the face. Which is good because you don't gain anything from Marxism and neither does anyone. Truth is, although the leader does benefit from Marxism by dictating the rules, in the end the people will find out they've been treated like pigs and then rebel. Leading to assassination, another part of our lives that we find irritating but necessary. Then the asshole will know he deserves it.
I ask you this question: Why doesn't China completely follow the Marxist theory? Why do they settle for half and try to be capitalist though at the same time looking to be keeping their communist ideals? Because if they were to devote themselves totally to Marxist roots, they'll end up with no real roots. Meaning they'll probably be left hanging in the air like a happy-face graph or stoning at the ground like a sad-face graph. Either way they die. I play many games and I tell you I never win using the theory of Marxism. Take Age of Mythology for example. I might have the best gods in Zeus or Ra but the moment I apply Marxist theories to run my city (ie food for everyone, building spread out evenly everywhere, etc.) I'm dead before I know it. Please. The moment I build farms to try to accommodate my people, the Greek d33k army next door just comes in with their bloody soldiers and march all over my land. What's more if you just solely build farms you will be unable to advance to the next age - further proving my point that Marxism gets you nowhere. No advancements, nothing. So why the hell stick to it?
If you play Runescape, I think you'll find this case true as well. I haven't played Dota personally but I think it also runs in pretty much the same way. Even NEOPETS understands that Marxism is a system doomed to failure. And if you play Utopia all the more you should find that Marxism is a dystopia rather than a utopia. For in the game Utopia there is NO Marxist theories involved AT ALL! That's why you get advancements. Although I have stopped playing Utopia already, these stands of mine still hold strong. Unlike those Marxist stands which can actually be burnt down because no Chandru will want to join them and build a strong foundation for their stands. No dy/dx, no stands.
To conclude, I think Marxism is screwed up. Otherwise, why do you think that Karl Marx is dead? There's a season for everything, and there's a reason for everything as well. The reason why there is no season for Marxism is because there is no reason for it. And that's all I have to say about Marxism. I could give you loads more reasons if it wasn't due tomorrow, but it is. Even deadlines don't follow the principles of Marxism - and you know deadlines are effective because you are reading this. The moment you apply Marxism in the school you would be equal to me and then I would not need to hand in any of my essays on Marxism. So actually just be glad that you're not following Marxism. You can't integrate them anywhere into anything, and that is why I like integration. Because it is such a sensible thing that rejects Marxism right in Marx's ugly, decomposed face (remember - he's dead)!! As an integral I conclude that Marxism can jolly well differentiate itself from the others, that useless system.
[1078 words]
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment